Kerem Akca film critic, directed by Dennis Gansel'in 'Nights In our' writing about his film "Do not go to this movie," he said to use the Distributor Ozen Film company was sued by. Three important pillars of the sector, producers, directors and critics, "a film critic's 'go' to mean 'Do not go' Do you have the right to say?" yönelttik question

FILM, NOT THE COMPANY POLICY criticizedKerem Akca / Film writerOne film critic 'film criticism' write 'Do not go to the movie! Says that this is wrong. Coke to comment zorlanılıp kaçıldığını documents. However, my main goal of my company's policy basmaktı finger. I ask again, is a German film released in dubbed English, press Go, or not do movies that put the author of the 'Anti-Piracy summer watch! Says,' Is it wrong Is it true that a company's position in the industry? Or, more accurately, let me define the expression, in the face of these situations are not going the cinema and box office figures for the spectator it is low, watch movies Anti-Piracy Who is guilty?
PERSONAL SALDIRIYA should becomeMehmet Soyarslan / Producer (Ozen Film)A film "Go" as in say, "Do not go" seems to mean normal. But there are few aspects of work. First, this critic, "I do not critique the movie," he says. English is critical. No one has the right to say such a thing. No one wants to watch the audience can not decide which language film. Last year, a film criticizing the company had been insulted. But alınmamıştık. Society of Film Critics is not my case. I know many of the best. I respect them all. But friends, why it did not say anything when a year before. Amnesty did not like it anymore. No need for such a personal attack. No reason for this attack, should be a penalty. Other side of the business have a. Made a movie. This film is serious charges. This is shown to the press before entering the local movie theaters. But some critics "do not go to this film," he says. This is very hurtful. Without leaving the movie theaters do not even know it correct to say that conscience.
Defended CRITICISMDervis Zaim / DirectorThe things people liked and has the right to dislike. But on the other hand there are unwritten conventions. Observance of these long-term benefit of everyone. Not liking a movie theater, in principle, the authors defend that right. Defend the right to express it clearly. I think that the right to prevent against it. Unless the point of insulting to say that the movie theater styles of the writers wanted to tell freely. One film critic, "I do not like this movie" we say. I mean this in a sense, already "do not go to this movie" is actually a form of saying more usturuplu. Kerem Bey, where "Do not go to this film," says does not say much more directly, mention you have selected the style of a narrative. PEOPLE WHO LIKE will also be here who do not like such as.
VERY LITTLE REAL critic
Cagan Irmak / DirectorI criticized the film is a film critic can say many things right. But for me, the most dangerous to idealize a film. The most severe language criticize a movie like that. But to idealize the concept of work entered into the messes it up. For example, compare the popular cinema of cinema art "should be like this" is not correct to say that. Films in the erosion of many things in our country, unfortunately, it also has its share. To criticize a movie, literally means 'critique' is. This job requirement to deposit a film on the table to analyze the criticism of those who think there is very little.As I said, there are two dangers: first, to idelalize and compare with other movies to request a single type of films. Secondly, to analyze a real shortfall in the film and deposited on the table. Everyone has a right to my film watching or seyretmeme. I'm not reading some of the critics.
Whether CRITICISM, Judicial OKURA beMurat Ozer / Movie WriterThe question is' hak'sa, a critic, for any movie, "Oh, do not miss, watch over and over!" As such guidance is avail, "escape and move away!" Has the right to say, although my preferred method if not. Just because a film, "Do not go!" Say 'simplistic' does not make sense to me than a conclusion sentence. Arguments that you think is correct it yourself by ordering a row is a good fiction can come to this conclusion, the reader can clear the judiciary. The fact that the film went söylemektense not to go, a reader of writing out a common denominator of the last point is to let her put the best thing, in my opinion.
TWO-PARTY OR INCORRECTAtilla Dorsay (SIYAD Honorary President)No film for myself, for so many years 'Do not go to this film' did not say as a critic, I have come across in Kerem Akça'nın already disagree with the statement. Criticisms can be very heavy, but no one to go or not to go zorlayamayız films. Ozen Film of the case, but it is not possible to participate in the. Already diminished, and this is a very old company had brought very few films, this works better than regulation, and Kerem know the person in front of all of the authors of the freedom of the press and the cinema girmemeliydi an attitude. I think sum up the wrong sides.
'My reader' know how to drive ...
Ugur Vardan / Movie WriterI filmed in the past, while the audience goes, I would read later criticisms. Because everyone already has its own cinema in this era of information and have manners, so for me, the critic, let me like an ordinary audience, wants to film critic, I can not see one of the film, underlining ıskaladığım places, allowing the pen erbabıdır different readings. I still do not read or watch a movie that critics of the film. In such a table, the "must-see on" or "Definitely do not go" type of propositions does not mean anything to me. Do not use these expressions velakin Amma own writings, of course, using the. Because the stereotypes of this kind needs a critic, in a sense, the stereotypes of today's cinema pass ... Kerem Akca friend, a young brother, in fact, after every film. If an error is made, the youth should, Iranian director Asghar Farhadi is already 'I think' masterpiece must be counted 'Separation' film 'over the five-star' has given, I say this is the real failure ...
English critic, paid reparationsUK author Sarah Thornton, 'Seven Days in the Art World' book in 2008 about the criticism by journalist Lynn Barber, started on: 65 thousand pounds won a defamation trial. Thornton in the case at the Supreme Court in London, the British Daily Telegraph newspaper published criticism 'vindictive' and in that said there was serious mistakes. Barber, but he is listed among the things spoken by the author in the book speak for the book, including the accusation of insulting the trial court denied Barber's defense. Thornton said after the court, "This case is, in essence, with honest journalism and journalism alakalıydı an example of the misuse," he spoke, a spokesman for the Telegraph, "Lynn Barber's reckless and ill-intentioned that the decision to reverse a decision to be in error and we believe that freedom of expression "he said.