Arrested suspects Akman and Karaman, HSYK'ya their complaint, the investigation prosecutors, about 18 people seized the assets of a portion of the court's decision suggests that they handle, ignoring the

Lighthouse eV trial detention of the suspects with the Channel 7 television RTUK the shareholders of the former President Zahid Akman Aykut Zekeriya Karaman, 3 prosecutor conducting the investigation, "irregularity" making the claim the Supreme Council of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK) filed a complaint.HSYK'ya delivered on 27 Temuz prosecutors who investigate complaints filed in Nadi Türkaslan Lighthouse eV, Mehmet Tamöz and Abdulvahap Yaren'e 6 separate claim was made for.The most important complaint filed complaints against prosecutors investigating "the falsification of a court decision."According to complaints filed, the Labor Party after the announcement of a crime. Lighthouse eV investigation begins in early 2009. At the first stage for the investigation of Ankara Prosecutor Nadi Türkaslan görevlendiriliyor. 21 May 2009 for the same file is given the task of prosecutors, Mehmet Tamöz and Abdulvahap Yaren'e.Prosecutors in the investigation, 1 June 2009, Ankara, Turkey 3 Magistrates' Court, including Zahid Akman, including contacting the confiscation of the assets of 19 people are asking all. Akman'la with the seizure of the assets of persons required as follows:Ferdowsi Ermis, Ismail Karahan, Mustafa Celik, Zekeriya Karaman, Mehmet Gurhan, Aykut Zahit Akman Harun Kapıyoldaş, lying Erhan, Orhan Durmaz, Portable Box, Right Sadal, Izzet Authority, Gokhan Gurbuz, Bedrettin Bulent Bilgin, Mehmet overflow, Ahmet Cosar, Umit Yasar Sincanoğlu, Hawk was going to throw.Prosecutors, on duty the court was the request of 2 important: first, the names of all persons of the above "all the real estate will have a direct or joint, land sea or air transport, partner, partnership shares in companies where" the seizure. The second "all immovable properties belonging to companies where their partner with the land, sea or air vehicles, other companies that partner in a partnership in which the common shares as a legal entity şirketlerinh" confiscation.
Not specified in the law demandedAnkara, Turkey 3 Magistrate Court Judge, Dr.. Aphakic İlleez, prosecutors claim the same day on Human Rights. By accepting the first item in demand, all real property 18 people, tools and common shares in companies that "seizure" made a decision.18 people co-owned firms, real estate, vehicles and the seizure of shares in other companies of the rejected decision. The judge, already shares the demand for the confiscation of the seized assets of the companies' demand as specified in the law as "the said.Again, the absence of Mehmet Siddik fisherman named for a person's identity number, the confiscation of goods, the demand "due to similarity of names from other people is not the victim" was rejected on the grounds. The first is that rejection of the other two decisions adopted in order, one under the written minutes of court dated June 1, 2009.Akman and Karaman in the event which is the subject of this complaint regarding the decision of the court. Claim that the suspects still in custody, said: "The investigation prosecutors seized 18 people malvarlıklarına confiscation of the assets of the companies that are common despite the rejection of a request, in order to confiscate the assets of these companies made the transaction. During these operations, Ankara, Turkey 3 Magistrates' Court decision was actually closed down over 2 red substance. "
Time ExceededAllegedly, according to prosecutors, the court's decision duplicate of the decision mentioned in subparagraph b and c, co-owned companies with the confiscation of the ID card built file malvarlıklarına non-objection decision regarding the person hung up. Is this process a complaint iligli by prosecutors or law enforcement (police) were expressed by the unknown is been done.Complaint annexes petition, the court's decision with the original copy of the deleted sub-paragraphs b and c, has also been added. Also in the annexes, Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor of Istanbul in Sultanahmet Press Crimes Investigation Bureau of Land Registry and Cadastre 2 Also has a correspondence between the Regional Office. However, based on this correspondence, Zekeriya Karaman been a shareholder of New World Communications Türk Telekom to include some real information, the documents relating to the complaint petition.The documents, Zekeriya Karaman is a partner of New World Communications Türk Telekom to the official records of some immovable properties "Property Information" sections of Chapter 3, Ankara Magistrates' Court pursuant to the decision of "commentary" seems to put into.Akman and Karaman also specified in the law of their stay in detention, arguing that time was spent 4 full-day basis for the law argue that no request for an arrest. According to complaint filed July 10 07:30 Akman detention period in the Zekeriya Karaman, and 3 for the other suspect on the same day at 14.00, although come to an end, the decision to arrest 20:15 'given in this case is alleged to be contrary to the laws and the Constitution.


Allegedly, the original decision of the court as above (top), and whether made by prosecutors or police to an unknown third parties in full sections (bottom) were no transactions were made with the new copy.