Alain Badiou and Slavoj Zizek's texts, consisting of a conference held in the initiative of 'Communism as an idea', and the future of the validity of the idea of ​​communism Eagleton'dan Rancière, Nancy Negri, one of the leading thinkers through the questioning

Communism, the only political idea to keep it alive Is it worth? Or by changing the emphasis, let us ask: Is it alive value is the only political idea of ​​communism? The ongoing era of free trade and capital accumulation, with a passion to love the philosophical ideas of communism can be said that the most intricate, but the only idea worth defending today to say that communism Platonic sense, it 'Idea makes a metonimisi: both are a part of both a representative of his. The next phase of this reasoning, which is that today's philosophers but the communists, we contribute to the book of communism, the authors look at the potential of this amazing idea comes to us unexpectedly. Jacques Rancière, Jean-Luc Nancy, Slavoj Zizek, Terry Eagleton, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, Alain Badiou, or common practices of the philosophical foundations of today realize the return movement (Eagleton is another book that "the past, right, forward!" Slogan summed up) and thought the ancient era of 'partnership' are attracted to the concept of a similar. The concept is vital, which is ultimately what Rancière 'Conflicts' book, as he said: "Politics, just leave the co-existence of people and delivered them to balance profit and loss starts is concerned", and so the common asset of the partnership area integrates komünizminkiyle. Publications enlarge the 'Communism as an idea entitled' in this exciting collection of articles, mostly focusing on the concept of this partnership. Two years ago in London, Birbeck Institute of Humanitarian Sciences of the book brings together papers presented at the conference organized by the English edition of the challenge was fun to Zizek, the following: "Do not be afraid and join us, come back! Entertainment, and so I pardoned you lived in the anti-communist, and now the time to be serious once more! "Statism, economism, the liberal consensus, private property and intellectual property rights, privatization, the suggestion of a non-communist book begins. Considering the last decade in Empire, Negri and Hardt describe their international trans-hegemonic empire, globalization, and the book first published in 2000 around the concept that the leading 'new world düzeni'yle alakalıydı, Naomi Klein, the last' communist Shock Doctrine and / or a Keynesian economics vazgeçemeyeceğimizi and today the Communist Party of China to have our entire capitalist communism has pointed out at the capitalisms; Zizek and Badiou, the French and the UK, they also feature provides a very hostile to Mao, Lenin and Stalin in place ' that the legacy of communism and the revolutionary-terör'ünün reddedilemeyeceğini claimed. In other words, non-communist forms of communism, communist place, questioning the occurrence of the communist and communism began to take an undertaking: the period of rejection, and instead of passing Badiou's concept of liberalism 'was an attempt to rethink the meaning of Event could. Communism is the beginning of the book is primarily Badiou İdea'sı presentation titled 'idea' he explains what he means. Badiou says that the connections are eliminated and removed specific names Idea "the revolutionary heroes of this shimmering Sebi Panteonu'nun what?" He asks. "Spartacus, Thomas Münzer, Robespierre, Toussaint-L'Ouverture, Blanqui, Marx, Lenin, Rosa Luxemburg, Mao, Che Guevara and many others we know why the name? The reason is that all these special names-an individual, an absolute singularity of the body and mind under the guise of politics-the truth of those rare and precious as volatile as the symbol of the historical network of sequences. "Immediately after Stalin's 'cult of person' within the framework with an emphasis on lanetlenişinin yanlışlığına person puts the emphasis on the necessity of the cult of the revolutionary figures Badiou'cu 'olay'ların (event) will of multitudes of those who gathered around the scene of history is becoming, and are in a position to be replaced. Stalin agreed, however, Badiou points ends here, nor is it a Mao'cu and brings to mind the historical logic of the paradoxes of Mao. "20 problems inherited from the 19th century, we received close to the problems explored in the first half of the century. Just to be around 1840 today, as the society itself is the only way to ensure that the rational arrangement, capitalism faced a completely cynical, "after the detection of these call for the revival of the Communist Idea, is:" Each time, the global and the local with the universal intellectual constructs but the universal truth that can be transferred as individual components and combining the experience of the individual consciousness of the communist hypothesis İdea'sına communism, or rather, we can give a new life. Idea which can lead to the existence of this third çağınca. We can do this. Then you have to do. "
But how? Zizek uses the presentation of another question, as the title (How to Start Over?), Where Lenin's revolution in 1922, wrote during a moment of retreat 'is a very high mountain, the climb to reach the summit of the mountain On the first attempt but failed to return to the valley when the Opening to the image of the mountaineer. Zizek is here 'zero point' icon turns and "Try again. One more defeat. Better defeat, "he proposes to start from the beginning to us with Becket. "Kierkegaard's terms, a revolutionary process, not a gradual process, a movement repeated, beginning a movement is repeated over and over again." Oksimoron This appears to be an important provision in sight 'prolaterya diktatörlüğü'nün talking about the nature of a letter sent to him by Bulent Somay'ın quote Somay'ın doing and its "profound criticism" draws our attention to suggest the following letter, addressed said: "The working class (such) thing on a mission, and only one other organization of the ruling class as a structural inadequacy. Eliminating its opposite in the history of the proletariat itself eliminates the single (revolutionary) class. "Terry Eagleton describes the delivery of a line between Shakespeare and Marx, and the Storm play in the shade have been talking about Gonzalo'dan character, ridiculed by young people around the hard-nosed members of the court quotes the words of equality: "All kinds of trade yasaklardım, the judge would not have blah blah, no one would no longer function, everyone would be idle ; would not have been the reigning; human nature üretirdi everything necessary; inadequate, effortless. "Oscar Wilde's side all day, come and lay down in comfortable clothing while on the one hand while reading Plato brendisini yudumladığı and" communist society, that is its own "talking about the interpretation of a communist Shakespeare puts into each other one after another with the Marx quote is: "You ignore the slave to those who disregard the principles of the gods / Show your strength without delay, / and remove this imbalance, / Everybody Get Up to no longer need." Commune of Communism by Michael Hardt and Jacques Rancière Komünizmsiz Communists? presentations also must be noted: the first is immaterial, and intellectual property forms of bio-political connections, expertly setting up a new hegemony, the second hypothesis, that the right to freedom from communism, whether the original query, that is, communism is a very 'özgürleşme'nin stresses that nature. This book is very important to us from the center of the ideals of equality and the collectivisation of a new horizon, point to the very old: the communist re-think on the idea of ​​equality and re-animate kolektifleşme. We can do this, then you have to do.